This controversial portrayal of Viennese artistic circles begins as the writer-narrator arrives at an ‘artistic dinner’ given by a composer and his society wife—a couple that the writer once admired but has now come to loathe. The guest of honor, an actor from the Burgtheater, is late. As the other guests wait impatiently, they are seen through the critical eye of the narrator, who begins a silent but frenzied, sometimes maniacal, and often ambivalent tirade against these former friends, most of whom were brought together by the woman whom they had buried that day. Reflections on Joana’s life and suicide are mixed with these denunciations until the famous actor arrives, bringing a culmination to the evening for which the narrator had not even thought to hope. Mr. Bernhard’s portrait of a society in dissolution has a Scandinavian darkness reminiscent of Ibsen and Strindberg, but it is filtered through with a minimalist prose. . . . *Woodcutters* offers an unusually strange, intense, engrossing literary experience.—Mark Anderson, *New York Times Book Review* Musical, dramatic and set in Vienna, *Woodcutters*. . . .resembles a Strauss operetta with a libretto by Beckett.—Joseph Costes, *Chicago Tribune* Thomas Bernhard, the great pessimist-rhapsodist of German literature . . . never compromises, never makes peace with life. . . . Only in the pure, fierce isolation of his art can he get justice.—Michael Feingold, *Village Voice* In typical Bernhardian fashion the narrator is moved by hatred *and* affection for a society that he believes destroys the very artistic genius it purports to glorify. A superb translation.— *Library Journal*
🎉 1/2 off all E-Books for Registering an account today! USE PROMO: 50%offregister
manbooker1989 (verified owner) –
Opinion is everything in literature, and Mr. Bernhard has got it down to a snarky snarl. What a wonderful use of the stream-of-consciousness in a manner that is rather inventive. The unnamed narrator is at a Vienna artistic party where he doesn’t want to be, and all the while, he is reflecting and criticizing everything around him. The novel is about the death of a friend, the party of a hated (but loved) couple, and about an actor that has a stroke of genius, to the momentary delight of the narrator. The effortless shifting from the recent past to the present is very remarkable; never is the plot dubious or confusing. The best part is from page 60 to page 80, in which a funeral and a luncheon are described in vivacious and energetic sarcasm. Although the repetition is aggravating, it actually becomes almost hysterically tiring after a hundred repeats (I thought as i sat in the wing chair). A very poignant slandered of society, but also of humanities (especially the narrator’s own) hypocrisy and prejudices.